
How to hit harder in tennis without swinging harder
Hit harder without swinging harder.
See it, eight instants at a time.
Every frame is traced from real match footage, so you see the shape of the stroke, not a drawing of an idea.

Move the idea yourself.
One instrument from The Program, free here. Drag it and watch the numbers change: models are labelled as models.

Each link peaks just after the one below it and passes the speed up. The racquet, last, gets the sum. The figure is a traced tour serve; the curves are drawn for illustration. Legs, hips and trunk: about 51 % of the energy (Kibler 1995). Of the arm's share of racquet speed: internal rotation about 40 %, pronation about 5 % (Elliott 2006).
Key facts
- ~40%
On the serve, internal rotation of the shoulder is the biggest single contributor to racquet speed, about 40%.
Elliott, "Biomechanics and tennis", British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2006
- 15%
Elliott’s Table 2 estimates upper-arm horizontal flexion at 15% for the power serve and 25% for forward racquet velocity in the topspin forehand.
Elliott, 2006, Table 2
- 48.1%
Pedro and colleagues found upper-arm flexion/abduction contributions of 48.1% cross-court and 45.2% inside-out in six players performing attacking forehands. The direction difference was not statistically significant.
Pedro et al., Sensors, 2022, Table 2; forward racquet-head centre velocity at impact
- 45.43m/s
A preliminary study of four ranked players reports peak racquet velocities during acceleration of 34.89 and 45.43 m/s for its slow-versus-fast serve comparison. These are racquet speeds, not ball speeds or population norms.
Gorce & Jacquier-Bret, Frontiers, 2024
- 51–55%
The 51–55% estimate concerns energy delivered to the hand by the legs and trunk together during the serve. It cannot be added to a percentage of racquet velocity.
Kovacs & Ellenbecker, Sports Health, 2011
Why it works
The court exerts an equal and opposite force when the player pushes against it. Muscle work and coordinated movement throughout the body also contribute to the stroke.
Legs, trunk, arm and racquet interact. A proximal-to-distal sequence is a learning cue, not a requirement that five measured speed peaks occur in a fixed order.
The lesson’s video-derived poses are smoothed and retimed. Their speed scale, ball speed and spin were presentation values. Relative motion is displayed; calibrated speed, energy and activation timing are not measured by these curves.
The line to say on court“The arm is last.”
Drill: The chain count
15 min · alone- Shadow-swing 20 forehands, counting out loud: legs, hips, torso, arm, racquet.
- Drop-feed 20 forehands from a comfortable knee bend and easy turn. Coordinate the legs, trunk and arm.
- Count how many land past the service line without you trying harder.
More drills like this: forehand
Faults and fixes
Questions players ask
Does tennis power come from the arm?
The arm contributes actively alongside the legs and trunk. Upper-arm internal rotation is an important contributor to racquet velocity at serve impact.
What is the kinetic chain in tennis?
The linked body segments that coordinate movement and transfer energy during the stroke.
Which part of the body is fastest at contact?
The racquet head can move much faster than the body’s joint centres. That comparison does not establish which segment supplied the most energy.
Do the links have to fire in a strict order?
A body-to-racquet sequence is a coaching cue. Exact timing varies with the stroke and player; these retimed, two-dimensional curves cannot verify a fixed order of five speed peaks.
What this doesn't cover
The Wave uses one retimed forehand reconstruction and a relative movement display. It cannot verify absolute speed, spin, energy transfer or a strict sequence of measured peaks. The alternate comparison makes two independent chart edits: an earlier arm curve and a reduced racquet curve. The reduction is assigned, not a calculated consequence. The 2024 study used optical markers and four ranked players, not wearable sensors on a professional sample. Serve estimates do not measure this forehand. Contribution percentages depend on the study, stroke and velocity definition; the serve estimates are not a pooled range. The 2022 forehand study used six elite men and 120 Hz inertial sensors in an attacking task.
Sources
- Elliott (2006), "Biomechanics and tennis", British Journal of Sports Medicine
- Kovacs & Ellenbecker (2011), An 8-Stage Model for Evaluating the Tennis Serve
- Gorce & Jacquier-Bret (2024), preliminary slow and fast serve comparison
- Pedro et al. (2022), attacking forehand contributions, Table 2
- Tanabe & Ito (2007), horizontal racquet velocity during serving
- Elliott, Marshall & Noffal (1995), power serve contributions